Reddit users debate whether negativity is old or new
2 Aug 15, 12:11 PM · 6d ago · 1 post · 2 comments · 2 sources · development 2 of 5
Commenters dispute the novelty of online negativity, with some citing dopamine-driven incentives in traditional media and others noting Reddit's historical toxicity alongside new algorithmic drivers.
“Being from the before times people were way more fun and nuanced. The negativity is a dopamine driven spiral, even old media did it 'if it bleeds it leads'.”
iguesssopplJoshua Conrad Jackson Incoming Harvard psychology professorJackson et al. Research team
The whole story pressvideopostscomments this development is lit · the numbers are the story's developments · click to move
What people said 2 posts and comments in this stretch · verbatim
-
Yeah I don't buy that excuse either. Being from the before times people were way more fun and nuanced. The negativity is a dopamine driven spiral, even old media did it 'if it bleeds it leads'. This is nothing new. Old media was so aware of it they'd typically be mindful of including at least some positive reports too. Any given day 100s of lives…
-
reddit is only good for information sharing. anytime a post is about something subjective, 90%+ of the comments are the scum of society yapping
All 5 developments of Study: Reddit grows more negative over time as users seek… →
RedditMastodonHacker NewsX