3Aug 17 1:58 PM · 7d ago · 2 comments · 1 source · development 3 of 7
Documentation clarified Origin is available only on Pro, Teams and Enterprise plans (not free plans), that codebase namespaces can't be changed once claimed during the beta, and that repo access follows the namespace owner's privacy mode.
cursor.com
“I do wonder if calling this "Origin" is going to result in semantic misinterpretations by LLMs.”
CursorAI coding company launching OriginGitHubIncumbent code-hosting platformElon Musk / xAIReported owner tied to Cursor, cited by critics@mehedih_Developer critic on X
The whole story articlespostscommentsthe bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Aug 13Aug 14Aug 15Aug 16Aug 17Aug 18Aug 19Aug 20Aug 21Aug 22Aug 23now · 7:20 AM ET
What people said 2 voices · verbatim
J
I do wonder if calling this "Origin" is going to result in semantic misinterpretations by LLMs. Ie saying,> "hey can you push to origin main?"now has two separate meanings.A LLM may inadvertently push your code to a new provider without you knowing. It's walking a thin line between genius-growth-move and domain typosquatting.
What I don't understand from the blog post is what's different in this offering than github - is it just the agentic tie ins where I can ask my agent to make changes while browsing the PR?Are there any fundamental differences, ie ways of working that solve the worktrees problem?
