Advocates argue industry must fund addiction support
3 Sep 10 9:17 AM · 14d ago · 4 comments · 1 source · development 3 of 6
A commenter calls for sports betting companies to contribute significant profits to addiction support organizations like GAMMON, and cites betting ads as a reason to avoid local television entirely.
“I firmly believe for the industry to exist it must contribute significant amounts of it's profits to support GANON & other addiction support entities”
steamrob42.bsky.socialgunnyjkj.bsky.social Bluesky user who posed the question
Peter Thiel Alleged owner of PolymarketEric and Don Jr. Alleged owners of Kalshi
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 4 voices · verbatim
-
I firmly believe for the industry to exist it must contribute significant amounts of it's profits to support GANON & other addiction support entities It's also YET another reason I rarely watch local TV due to the Pharm / Sports betting ads
-
Because the people who own sports betting ARE the elected government
-
They’re everywhere and I mute them every time but any sporting event is becoming almost unwatchable with them
-
I think they are identical, except for the difference in the product that addicts and harms you.
All 6 developments of Why aren't sports betting ads regulated like cigarette ads? →
Bluesky