Reddit debate splits over the mission's scientific value
3 Sep 10 2:00 PM · 15d ago · 2 posts · 15 comments · 2 sources · development 3 of 3
Commenters on the r/space-style thread argue over whether the slow, soon-to-be-obsolete probe is a meaningful engineering step or a waste of resources, with some questioning the choice of Alpha Centauri over other target stars and the low cruise speed.
“Even it it would work after all that time, the signal would get lost in noise.”
Oh_ffs_seriouslyPhilip Johnston Fermi Explorer co-founder, Starcloud co-founderStarcloud Aerospace company behind Starcloud-1 satelliteBreakthrough Starshot Initiative Rival 2016 interstellar proposal
The whole story articlespostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 19 voices · verbatim
-
Nice point - I started reading the Wikipedia article on the Alpha Centauri system. I would consider my statement disproven by your info. I'm not aware of any reason why TRAPPIST-1 would be more likely to host life than any other red dwarf with an Earth-size planet in the habitable zone. Of course, there are more planets on TRAPPIST-1, but that is…
-
If it is supposed to last longer than anything we have ever created then something new will need to be learned. And u sing existing technologies will still teach them things because they will have to be applied to this particular project. Learning about how it travels in interstellar space at speed would be useful too. I don't think this project…
-
That's very slow. We can do better. The sweet spot for interstellar spacecraft speed with current technologies is 0.05% to 0.1% of the speed of light. It's hard to accelerate a ship to higher speeds using chemical or ion propulsion, and higher speeds also mean more damaging collisions with particles and dust. I'm talking about a probe weighting a…
-
This programme will further or knowledge because it requires doing scientific feats no one has achieved before and prove we have the technology to do this today. It's also very very cheap for what it is. We won't remember it, that's not the point. It's just a time capsule - the hope is that it will be the last to arrive. Okay it's a message in a…
-
I don’t know, nowadays you need specialized tools to even access those records. Everything digital requires a computer, and not all computers can read all formats etc… So if by a Great Filter we lose that knowledge, will we be able to come back to it?
-
"What are the odds of a species developing technology in the next 80,000 years " Why would 80,000 years have anything to do with it? Maybe they already have the technology. That said, I think it is unlikely, and this seems like a pointless exercise.
-
No they aren't this is a new thing doing something completely different. It's using new science to do so. No it isn't they aren't going anywhere anybody is expecting us to be in 80k years. Yes... To aliens not our future selves.
-
Imagination is the only way you would receive any signal emitted by such a small spacecraft from an another solar system. Even it it would work after all that time, the signal would get lost in noise.
-
At best it could be an engineering challenge, but then they want to functionally discard their testbed after a tiny amount of test time so it doesn't even have that going for it.
-
They definitely have, I listened to an interview with them about this they want this mission to be obsolete they are just doing this mostly to inspire people.
-
Even if it's not expensive, it pulls resources that could go to other projects that could achieve more for science than sending a lump of metal far away can.
-
Anatomically modern human beings have existed for well over 300,000 years so what makes you think we can't make it another 80,000? Have a little optimism.
-
Well at least the aliens that see this entering their solar system in a couple million years will have their own Oumuamua/Randezvous with Rama moment
-
The Voyagers are already doing this. The Voyagers are already doing this. The Voyagers are already doing this.
-
Sure I understand but would you trust ppl 50 years in the future? Or do you think there’s still ppl then?
-
Maybe get a sense of humor amigo, I’m sure he knows they aren’t sending humans on an 80000 year journey
-
So send one then too. It's not an expensive project as far as space missions go. Just do it.
-
They probably won’t even see it. By that point it will be a tiny little cold brick.
-
Without any science reason, it seems to be a pointless waste of time and energy.
All 3 developments of Space enthusiasts unveil AI-routed 80,000-year mission to… →
MastodonRedditGoogle NewsHacker News