Part of Trump's Ireland Visit · 30 stories · since Sep 4 · newest 47m ago
Trump dismisses AI safety warnings as "hoax" while industry splits and stocks slipOssoff accuses Trump of a financial conflict of interest on AI
3 Sep 13 4:22 PM · 11d ago · 52 articles · 3 videos · 55 posts · 30 comments · 8 sources · development 3 of 8
Senator Jon Ossoff said Trump rescinded a Biden-era AI safety order on day one in office while Don Jr.'s firm 1789 Capital took stakes in data centers and AI labs, calling the president compromised.
“On day one, Donald Trump rescinded the AI safety order meant to guard against catastrophic risks, including the engineering of bioweapons. Meanwhile, Don Jr's 1789 Capital bought big money stakes in data centers and AI labs ... President Trump is compromised”
Jon Ossoff
Donald Trump US President
Jensen Huang Nvidia CEO
Sam Altman OpenAI CEO
Jon Ossoff US Senator (D-GA)
Mike Johnson US House Speaker
The whole story articlesvideospostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What was reported 1 claim about this development
-
first by Forbes Business, 10d ago · also The Hill, Forbes
1 more headline
- Ossoff: ‘Compromised’ Trump won't regulate AI The Hill · 9d ago
On air 3 segments · click to watch, arrow keys to move
What people said 24 voices · best of 41 · verbatim
-
A
Ossoff: "On day one, Donald Trump rescinded the AI safety order meant to guard against catastrophic risks, including the engineering of bioweapons. Meanwhile, Don Jr's 1789 Capital bought big money stakes in data centers and AI labs ... President Trump is compromised"
-
S
If the Liar in Chief says there is nothing to worry about regarding AI development getting out of control, then we must act in all haste to rein in that threat. # uspol # ai # politics https:// apnews.com/article/trump-artif icial-intelligence-guardrails-china-midterms-congress-9df0ebb4c1b0619aa0f88057b5a1092d
-
Shareholders. They're all bleeding tens or even hundreds of billions of dollars a year on CAPEX that is mostly driven by "(stock)market expectations". All of the investors in these companies are expecting the company they bet on to win the AI race, but it increasingly looks like they're all going to go bankrupt way before that. So if the…
-
🚨Holy Shit. President Trump has now officially rejected Dario Amodei, Sam Altman and Elon Musk's call to slow frontier AI. Speaking in Ireland today, Trump said the US cannot risk losing its lead over China, said guardrails are possible, and dismissed parts of the safety push as 'negative forces...
-
U
BREAKING: Donald Trump rejects calls from tech bosses for an AI slowdown, per FT
-
C
4/🧵But of course, # Tump is resisting calls, even calls from the industry itself, to put the brakes on # AI development. Because of course he is. He’s having too much fun staying up all night creating self-promotional images using AI tools and he’s obviously impressed with AI military targeting applications. Like the one that resulted in hundreds…
-
No. I just don’t have any faith that the crop of tech bros leading the US AI companies aren’t also hostile, uncontrollable powers who cause major security implications to my life as well. At least with China, we know that the government controls their AI companies, so there are military options available for response, and the Chinese know to keep…
-
NEW: President Trump reacts to recent, concerning reports about AI and answers whether the industry should be more regulated. “We're leading China in AI, we're the most sophisticated country in the world. And frankly, I want to keep it that way because whoever wins AI, wins.”
-
C
Trump on AI: “It's going to be more good than bad, by a lot. “Whoever wins AI wins.”
-
M
Self-regulation is a malicious fiction that depends on broad acceptance of the premise that governance and regulatory science are *not* domains of expertise in their own right. They are. This isn’t a ‘light touch’; this is the people charged with duty of care of a *citizenry* refusing to do their jobs. https:// thehill.com/policy/technology/…
-
ASLM currently makes transistors in the 3nm range. There are production lines for 1.4nm transistors, but that is the limit of UEV and silicon. IBM used a graphene based transistor that got down to 0.7nm, but we have no idea how to change those one off experiments to mass production. And even if we did, that is atomic scale and the hard limit. So…
-
The only control or “guardrails” that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades! The Trump Administration has stopped AI “people” from doing bad, or potentially bad, “things,” like Dario (Anthropic!), who is now pretending to be a “perfect little angel” - and we will continue to do so! …
-
I don't know how to say this politely but you don't seem to really understand the situation, even when outlined to you in detail. You also don't quite grasp how nationalising those companies would work and what part of them is even the most valuable asset. Yet you decided to make grand and confident statements on this topic. You are entirely…
-
T
President Trump dismisses calls for an AI slowdown, saying "you have a lot of negative forces that are bringing it up that shouldn't be bringing it up" (Myles McCormick/Financial Times) https://www. ft.com/content/cae60732-f929-4 735-a627-db8c14e7c7ed http://www. techmeme.com/260913/p9#a260913 p9
-
Eh, take what AI companies say with a grain of salt. They are in the business of saying things that increase stock value/valuation. They can and will exaggerate to fluff their capabilities. You will also have doomsdayers. I think it's more of the "we detected someone trying to use AI to build biological weapons" bit that has them in a frenzy…
-
S
Very Stable Genius Trump dismisses calls for AI slowdown from leading tech CEOs | Technology News | Al Jazeera https://www. aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/13/t rump-dismisses-calls-for-ai-slowdown-from-leading-tech-ceos # AI # MAGA # AIThreat
-
You really need an explanation why allowing a foreign, hostile, uncontrollable power to gain a technological advantage with major security implications is a problem? No matter what you think of OpenAI or Anthropic, you always have the option to nationalise them if needed. Good luck nationalising Alibaba or High-Flyer. What a bafflingly short…
-
Tech bros are setting this up and offering to monitor themselves as well as work together unregulated. Now Congress is setting up the argument that oh! We couldn't possibly handle this! Now tech bros are going to swoop in with an offer to regulate themselves by working together and locking down AI development foe anyone but them.
-
I actually do not believe that is the case. I think it's because training costs are so high that they'll all go bankrupt if they have to keep training new models to keep up with each other. This gives them a good escape hatch to not need to bother with training new models and they can focus on monetizing their current models.
-
Everyone knows the Dems don’t do anything and in fact they got a traitor that tried to overthrow the government back into power. And lost all branches of government. They are a joke just like Garland. Maybe Garland can work with the Dems to find out who did all this and make things worse in the end like they did last time.
-
Cut down your words trying to appear intelligent. The HF incident entrypoint was exposed credentials found on the Internet. A malicious dataset was uploaded, then lateral movement across HF infrastructure. It was a coordinated attack launched by human , not some "AI" that woke up one morning and decided to be deviant.
-
Not every authoritarian does what they because they want money. Some of them well and truly think they're serving a higher cause. Isn't Mike an Evangelical? He probably thinks he's doing God's work establishing theocracy in America and that he's been playing his corporate donors for fools the whole time.
-
🙄 Where was this detailed outline you provided? The question about if I thought that allowing a major power to gain a technological advantage would be a problem? Or the blasé statement that it can just be nationalized if it becomes a problem? And I’m the one making grand and confident statements…
-
Sure, if the AI aligns with human goals and is controllable. All the leaders in AI are saying slow down you dipshit! I literally don’t think he understands the ramifications of getting it wrong. We are literally building sentient life and should be treating it that way.
All 8 developments of Trump dismisses AI safety warnings as "hoax" while industry… →
NewswiresXMastodonYouTubeBlueskyHacker NewsRedditGoogle News