Users question extinction model consistency and data completeness
3 Sep 11 1:16 PM · 12d ago · 1 post · 5 comments · 2 sources · development 3 of 3
Commenters identify logical inconsistencies in the model output: one notes a glacier showing longer survival at +4.0°C warming than at +2.7°C (counterintuitive results). Others report missing glaciers from the explorer (e.g., Fox Glacier and Franz Josef Glacier in New Zealand initially not found), and question whether the baseline perimeter data used for predictions is accurate enough to support the extinction timelines shown.
“I don't understand why a glacier would survive longer in the 4°C scenario than 2.5°C but this seems to suggest so.”
a1371K. Van Tricht Researcher, tool designer
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 5 voices · verbatim
-
In 2004, I visited New Zealand. It was my first international trip as part of a 6 week long geology field camp. One of the coolest experiences was getting to visit the Fox Glacier and Franz Josef Glacier on the South Island.Checking this out, I don't see the Fox Glacier or Franz Josef Glacier specifically listed in the search field, but moving the…
-
There was an episode of Northern Exposure where an entire frozen mammoth was exposed. Before the main character could report this amazing find to anyone to be preserved in a museum one of the locals dragged it to house and butchered it for steaks.
-
Yeah, it doesn't seem to make any of the glaciers in NZ, even when they do have names.Limitation of the data set I guess.
-
Weird seeing this posted as I’m up in Alaska right now viewing glaciers and being sad about how much they’ve receded.
-
Also one of my fav experiences skydiving over those glaciers. My teeth were so cold!
All 3 developments of Van Tricht releases interactive map of individual glacier… →
MastodonHacker News