Post author defends AI use; minority of commenters remain admiring
4 Sep 13 9:25 AM · 10d ago · 11 comments · 1 source · development 4 of 6
Marlena-love responded defensively to mrkranky's criticism with 'You really ARE Kranky! It's time to defund (once again) the wrong AI Police!' A small group of commenters, including veronicatess and customcouture, continued praising the image's beauty, with customcouture suggesting 'Amazing some animals were born looking like AI.'
“You really ARE Kranky!😁It's time to defund (once again) the wrong AI Police!💕”
marlena-love.bsky.socialmarlena-love.bsky.social Original postermiha-ha.bsky.social Commentermrkranky.bsky.social Commenterfartyfey.bsky.social Commenter
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 11 voices · verbatim
-
It is AI generated. These birds exist but they do not look like this.
-
These birds are amazingly beautiful in their own right without needing to “enhance” them with ridiculous looking ai.
-
M
You really ARE Kranky!😁It's time to defund (once again) the wrong AI Police!💕
-
Wow that's gorgeous, the markings are incredible.
-
AI fans/propagandists have absolutely no shame
-
That's what you call avian haute couture.
-
That has to be one of the most beautiful birds I have ever seen! Almost too much so to be real.
-
Just wowed!! Amazing some animals were born looking like AI.🫶🏻🫶🏻🫶🏻🫶🏻
-
This is AI slop, not a crowned pigeon. Stop it.
-
please identify as Ai.....unless Nature. :)
-
New York City pigeons do not look like this!
All 6 developments of Bluesky user posts AI-generated pigeon image as real… →
Bluesky