Commenters challenge the payback math and premises
2 Sep 14 10:33 PM · 13d ago · 1 post · 2 comments · 2 sources · development 2 of 5
Multiple Hacker News users dispute the calculator's assumptions. Some claim token throughput estimates are too low or daily token defaults unrealistically conservative. Others question whether cost savings alone justify the comparison, given non-financial reasons for local deployment.
“43 years to break even on Qwen 3.8 at 25% the speed of the API, lol.”
jrflorlindsey123 Developer
The whole story articlespostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 2 voices · verbatim
-
43 years to break even on Qwen 3.8 at 25% the speed of the API, lol. I like the idea of local models for really small tasks like automation/toolcalling, but it will probably never make sense for coding. I tried them and it was just excruciating compared to what you get for $100 a month from a subscription.
-
I doubt it will ever be cost effective for the foreseeable future. The AI companies have astonishing amounts of compute and they’re effectively dumping it on the market.
All 5 developments of Sunk Cost calculator shows when local LLM hardware pays for… →
Hacker NewsMastodonNewswires