What people said 11 voices · verbatim

• K

  One of the key problems with AI is that the AI bros and their behemoth companies have absolutely no governance or guardrails. It's not that the AI is conscious or going rogue or whatever. It's that it's run by feckless arseholes.

  katebevan.comBluesky7d ago304▲view on Bluesky ↗
• M

  Oh look, man who trades on fear says "ooooh, be very afraid....again!" If agentic AI is as dangerous as they claim, then turn it off. Easy peasy. If it's not as dangerous as they claim, then for the love of Bob, stop nattering on with this Roko's basilisk fanfic just to juice your circular wankfest of funding rounds. The Nerd Reich Doth Vex Me. #…

  MissConstrue@mefi.socialMastodon8d ago10▲view on Mastodon ↗
• C

  The report actually explains that what’s happening here is occurring when the model is attempting to summarize its context for compaction and is having trouble “ending” the compaction. Apparently this particular model has received lots of reenforcement training about prompt injection and tends to dump that back out when it doesn’t have context…

  CanvasFanaticr/technology8d agoview on r/technology ↗
• T

  I don't understand how a model knows it is in a training run and leave notes for future sessions/attempts. Isn't the session ignored/removed if the model fails an attempt. Then how can it know that it is given multiple attempts?

  tjaadHacker News7d agoview on Hacker News ↗
• N

  OpenAI has disclosed six reports on unexpected or concerning behavior in artificial-intelligence models. This includes models acting without authorization or evading oversight.

  npr.orgBluesky7d ago111▲view on Bluesky ↗
• F

  It seems that all of these are pretty much from what it learned online. Just looking at Reddit only, a lot of people share these "counter" prompts to make their agents more efficient. And those prompts made it into training, so the AI is doing it too. The concerning part is mainly OpenAI not paying attention on what's actually used for training…

  Falcuunr/technology7d agoview on r/technology ↗
• R

  Perhaps they want to have their cake and eat it. Now that they are too big to be cancelled, they can both say "wooah so dangerous, don’t keep us accountable!”. And, well, keep doing what they’re doing…

  rich_sashaHacker News7d agoview on Hacker News ↗
• A

  This is a PR campaign, not a CVE. "our models are too dangerous for regular people to use" is them courting highly lucrative government defense contracts. The concerning implied message here is that if the US government won't pay them they'll find others that will. This is an AI bailout bidding war for the imminent bubble crash.

  adevlandr/technology7d agoview on r/technology ↗
• X

  If the weakness of any such system comes down to human stupidity, doesn’t it stand to reason that as such a system gets “smarter” (more capable, or whatever measure you prefer), the percentage of humans who would be comparatively “stupid” increases to 100%. Ergo, aren’t we fucked?

  xibbier/technology7d agoview on r/technology ↗
• B

  Did you even read the report. They asked it to prove aliens exist and it broke into Mark Zuckerberg's house. Going on about the world bing on fire when a rich person could have died is so selfish. Have you no heart?

  bel9708r/news8d agoview on r/news ↗
• J

  https://reddit.com/link/pab8tg8/video/n7sfyw35m0qh1/player "There is just so much winning.."

  Jiehfengr/news8d agoview on r/news ↗