Reader jokes coverage should clarify these are Tasmanian devils
3 Sep 21 2:12 AM · 2d ago · 1 article · 1 post · 2 sources · development 3 of 4
A social media commenter reacted to the reporting with a joke that outlets should specify the animal, not the demon, given the species' folkloric name.
“Huhhh maybe they should have added the context that these are *Tasmanian* devils...”
ljwrites@writeout.inkTimothy Churchill Paleontologist and zooarchaeologist, University of New South WalesGavin Ashburton Researcher, PKKP Aboriginal CorporationPKKP Aboriginal Corporation Puutu Kunti Kurrama and Pinikura Aboriginal CorporationRio Tinto Mining company
The whole story articlesposts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Reported in the same hours no headline names this development itself — these 1 claim were published in its stretch
-
first by Vet Practice Magazine, 2d ago
What people said 1 voice · verbatim
-
L
“The study, published in Archaeology in Oceania, also shows repeated devil activity at the site. Bone marks suggest devils fed on animal remains left behind by people.” Huhhh maybe they should have added the context that these are *Tasmanian* devils... https:// archaeologymag.com/2026/09/tas manian-devils-lived-in-australia-for-45000-years/ #…
All 4 developments of Fossils show Tasmanian devils scavenged human camps in WA's… →
NewswiresMastodonGoogle News