2Sep 17 9:26 AM · 6d ago · 2 posts · 2 sources · development 2 of 5
A Mastodon post breaks down the results of Shah's ten interviews: three authors dodged the interview, three could not answer basic questions, three answered basic questions but struggled with technical ones, and one succeeded.
“The value of publication as a signal of researcher contribution is much weaker when authors cannot explain or defend their paper.”
marick@mstdn.social (quoting the article)
Nihar B. ShahEditor-in-chief, Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR)
The whole story poststhe bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Sep 16Sep 17Sep 18Sep 19Sep 20Sep 21Sep 22yesterdaynow · 3:54 AM ET
What people said 1 voice · verbatim
M
Editor-in-chief of Transactions on Machine Learning Research wanted to interview authors of ten (already desk-rejected) papers about the content of their own paper. The expected ensues. 3 dodged the interview. 3 could not answer basic questions. 3 could answer basic questions, but struggled with technical ones. 1 success "The value of publication…