conv.

← The whole story
AI
100+ AI experts demand independent safety evaluators for frontier AI labs

AI Evaluator Forum releases letter demanding evaluator independence

1 Sep 18 · 9d ago · 1 article · 1 source · development 1 of 2

A coalition of over 100 AI experts, organized by the AI Evaluator Forum and including Geoffrey Hinton and representatives from Johns Hopkins, Stanford, and METR, published a public letter calling on frontier AI companies to guarantee third-party safety evaluators independence, resources, and legal protections.

AI Evaluator Forum releases letter demanding evaluator independence
Quartz

“We're just trying to really demonstrate a shared common ground on basic principles and ensure that independent oversight can be a meaningful tool for managing AI risk broadly.”

Conrad Stosz

Conrad Stosz Chair, AI Evaluator ForumGeoffrey HintonGeoffrey Hinton AI researcher, letter signatoryVinh Nguyen Senior Fellow for AI, Council on Foreign Relations; former NSA chief AI officerDario AmodeiDario Amodei CEO, Anthropic

The whole story articlesposts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump

Peak 3 pieces in 3h at Sep 17, 11 PM; 10 pieces over 10 days (7 articles · 3 posts) Sep 17, 11 PM — 3 pieces · 3 articles — Newswires 3Sep 18, 2 AM — quietSep 18, 5 AM — quietSep 18, 8 AM — 3 pieces · 2 articles · 1 post — Newswires 2, Bluesky 1Sep 18, 11 AM — quietSep 18, 2 PM — quietSep 18, 5 PM — 1 piece · 1 article — Google News 1Sep 18, 8 PM — 1 piece · 1 article — Newswires 1Sep 18, 11 PM — quietSep 19, 2 AM — quietSep 19, 5 AM — quietSep 19, 8 AM — quietSep 19, 11 AM — 1 piece · 1 post — Reddit 1Sep 19, 2 PM — quietSep 19, 5 PM — quietSep 19, 8 PM — quietSep 19, 11 PM — quietSep 20, 2 AM — quietSep 20, 5 AM — quietSep 20, 8 AM — quietSep 20, 11 AM — quietSep 20, 2 PM — quietSep 20, 5 PM — quietSep 20, 8 PM — quietSep 20, 11 PM — quietSep 21, 2 AM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Sep 21, 5 AM — quietSep 21, 8 AM — quietSep 21, 11 AM — quietSep 21, 2 PM — quietSep 21, 5 PM — quietSep 21, 8 PM — quietSep 21, 11 PM — quietSep 22, 2 AM — quietSep 22, 5 AM — quietSep 22, 8 AM — quietSep 22, 11 AM — quietSep 22, 2 PM — quietSep 22, 5 PM — quietSep 22, 8 PM — quietSep 22, 11 PM — quietSep 23, 2 AM — quietSep 23, 5 AM — quietSep 23, 8 AM — quietSep 23, 11 AM — quietSep 23, 2 PM — quietSep 23, 5 PM — quietSep 23, 8 PM — quietSep 23, 11 PM — quietSep 24, 2 AM — quietSep 24, 5 AM — quietSep 24, 8 AM — quietSep 24, 11 AM — quietSep 24, 2 PM — quietSep 24, 5 PM — quietSep 24, 8 PM — quietSep 24, 11 PM — quietSep 25, 2 AM — quietSep 25, 5 AM — quietSep 25, 8 AM — quietSep 25, 11 AM — quietSep 25, 2 PM — quietSep 25, 5 PM — quietSep 25, 8 PM — quietSep 25, 11 PM — quietYesterday, 2 AM — quietYesterday, 5 AM — quietYesterday, 8 AM — quietYesterday, 11 AM — quietYesterday, 2 PM — quietYesterday, 5 PM — quietYesterday, 8 PM — quietYesterday, 11 PM — quietToday, 2 AM — quietToday, 5 AM — quietToday, 8 AM — quietToday, 11 AM — quietToday, 2 PM — quiet 1–2
1–2AI Evaluator Forum releases letter…
Sep 18Sep 19Sep 20Sep 21Sep 22Sep 23Sep 24Sep 25yesterdaynow · 3:49 PM ET

What was reported 2 claims about this development

  1. 2 outlets Anthropic and OpenAI need truly independent safety evaluators, experts say in public letter

    first by CNBC, 9d ago · also Quartz

    1 more headline
  2. 1 outlet AI experts warn safety evaluators lack independence and protections

    first by qz.com, 8d ago

All 2 developments of 100+ AI experts demand independent safety evaluators for… →

NewswiresBlueskyGoogle NewsRedditMastodon