What people said 24 voices · best of 56 · verbatim

• @

  BREAKING: 🇺🇸🇩🇰 Denmark yielded to the US regarding Greenland, despite public opposition. The US and Denmark have agreed on significantly expanding the US military presence in Greenland, per Reuters The deal will include Greenland joining the "Golden Dome" missile defense shield

  @Megatron_ronX5d ago797▲view on X ↗
• B

  many of you won't fall for this, but just in case: the # usa and # denmark has a deal about # us # military in # greenland since 1951 nothing has changed or rather, an example: # trump used to howl about the trade agreement between usa # canada and # mexico . so he made his own one. because it had "trump" written on it in crayon in his second…

  benroyce@mastodon.socialMastodon5d ago14▲view on Mastodon ↗
• D

  A party is far more than a president. A party is far more than its congress people and senators. A party includes its constituents. The “culture” doesn’t just mean what laws are and aren’t past. Because laws aren’t the only thing that affects society. It’s the culture within the party, how the constituent treat people and act in the world. Even…

  DeRpY_CUCUMBERr/Economics5d agoview on r/Economics ↗
• @

  1951: Denmark keeps sovereignty. U.S. gets broad rights to operate military facilities in Greenland. 2026: Denmark keeps sovereignty. U.S. keeps broad rights to operate military facilities in Greenland. The “new” part? Blocking adversarial military activity that wasn’t

  @AmyMcGrathKYX5d ago249▲view on X ↗
• M

  Trump says U.S. will defend Greenland as part of 'permanent' security deal with Denmark (Michael Birnbaum/Washington Post) https://www. washingtonpost.com/politics/20 26/09/18/trump-announces-deal-over-greenland-that-stops-short-us-control/ http://www. memeorandum.com/260918/p115#a2 60918p115

  memeorandum@universeodon.comMastodon5d ago1▲view on Mastodon ↗
• F

  No, the U.S. cannot simply build whatever it wants in Greenland without restriction. The claim that Washington gained total, unilateral authority to construct facilities at will reflects political posturing rather than the binding legal framework governing the island. Key Legal and Operational Limits Mandatory Parliamentary Ratification: The…

  Fun-Regular8902r/worldnews5d agoview on r/worldnews ↗
• D

  Uhhh...wtf. # CdnPoli # USPol # politics https://www. cbc.ca/news/world/trump-deal-c laim-greenland-denmark-security-9.7350385

  dcdeejay@mastodon.onlineMastodon5d ago1▲view on Mastodon ↗
• S

  You're joking right? You're kind of making my point for me. The resources of Canada are our concern alone. What we do with them, how we use them etc comes as a result of being part of the sovereign nation of Canada and no one else. Full stop. The freedom to self determination of the people of Greenland should be the purview of the citizens of…

  spookyfodderr/europe5d agoview on r/europe ↗
• H

  Trump overhypes himself and whatever he's selling. An election victory, a law, a regulation, a war. He does it when he's selling condos he hasn't built, golf course memberships for courses still under construction, or describing the most beautiful dance hall on the planet that's still in the planning phase. He's doing that here, over a deal with…

  huntingdon@mstdn.socialMastodon5d agoview on Mastodon ↗
• N

  Nah, no approval in the areas according to the words of the treaty itself . This is the full section on what the US can do within the areas they defend. the Government of the United States of America, without compensation to the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark, shall be entitled within such defense area and the air spaces and waters adjacent…

  NotNotWrongUsuallyr/worldnews4d agoview on r/worldnews ↗
• H

  The United States, Denmark and Greenland have ‌entered into an agreement for the US to develop a significant military presence on Greenland, while prohibiting US adversaries from building their own bases on the island, Donald Trump said on Friday. https://www. reuters.com/world/china/us-den mark-close-greenland-deal-sources-say-2026-09-18/ #…

  hanse_mina@mastodon.socialMastodon5d agoview on Mastodon ↗
• E

  Overhead people talking, a full diaper or a skipped nappy-time - what he does is really a big roll of dice. We're not giving them anything. We've sold them a deal to an item they already have. They already had access to Greenland. The exception here is the clause about NATO. The second the US steps out of NATO, then they have no rights to…

  EggstaticAd8262r/europe4d agoview on r/europe ↗
• U

  Trump and leaders of Denmark and Greenland announce plan to sign Arctic security pact next week – live – The Guardian Trump and leaders of Denmark and Greenland announce plan to sign Arctic security pact next week – live The… # UnitedStates # US # USA # america # unitedstatesofamerica # USnews # USAnews

  UnitedStates@pubeurope.comMastodon5d agoview on Mastodon ↗
• B

  If anyone wants an absolutely clear-cut, verifiable, experiment-based illustration of my point, skim any random 10 pages of the Heritage Foundation's 900-page Mandate for Leadership policy goals document for this administration. Then do a quick Google search to see what steps have been taken towards the policies you find. You'll find that nearly…

  Buzumabr/geopolitics5d agoview on r/geopolitics ↗
• E

  https://www. europesays.com/3259037/ Trump says US has struck security agreement with Denmark over Greenland # Conflicts # DanishPrimeMinister # Danmark # denmark # GovernmentOfGreenland # Greenland # Nuuk # PresidentDonaldTrump

  europesays@pubeurope.comMastodon5d agoview on Mastodon ↗
• S

  Or maybe there’s no plan at all. It's like the one thing Trump's idiocy and the "blob" meet on, he probably only got the idea because he overhead people talking about it (unlike e.g: his Canada claim), Greenland shores up America's eastern flank and also denies 2 out of 4 legs of the Arctic route that will be crucial in the future from…

  SomewhereOpposite883r/europe5d agoview on r/europe ↗
• J

  Fk you # Denmark , for permitting the depraved US empire's criminal foot in # Greenland . https://www. abc.net.au/news/2026-09-19/don ald-trump-announces-deal-with-denmark-us-military-greenland/107171964 # USFascism

  Jinjirrie@mastodon.socialMastodon5d agoview on Mastodon ↗
• P

  Denmark barely cared when we accidentally created a radiological incident when a plane crashed. They just wanted it cleaned up. They were otherwise willing to violate their own nuclear-free laws for the US. And the 1951 treaty basically gave the US carte blanche to build whatever it wanted, wherever it wanted. This is a dumb deal even if it cost…

  PausedForVolatilityr/geopolitics5d agoview on r/geopolitics ↗
• J

  Wtaf!? --- US and Denmark reach security deal after Trump’s threats to take over Greenland | World news | The Guardian https://www. theguardian.com/world/2026/sep /18/united-states-denmark-greenland-security

  jockr@mastodon.socialMastodon5d agoview on Mastodon ↗
• E

  It's not about being scared, it's about being smart. Europe is the intelligent actor here. There are so many parameters in this, that needs to all in place. So we've been buying time and we are making steps towards a world where the US does not get to set the order of the day/week/month or year. I don't think they'll establish on Greenland…

  EggstaticAd8262r/europe5d agoview on r/europe ↗
• G

  U.S. Has Reached Greenland Security Agreement https://www. wsj.com/politics/national-secu rity/trump-says-u-s-has-reached-greenland-security-agreement-with-denmark-61a7ffcd?st=eBN6Vi

  GiftArticles@tomkahe.comMastodon4d agoview on Mastodon ↗
• A

  I have a different reading. Maybe i am wrong. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/den001.asp The original treaty says in article 2. "defense areas shall be determined from time to time by agreement between the two Governments in each case" That condition remains operative todate. 2004 amendment explicity defines Thule as thedefence area…

  AffectionateRub1857r/geopolitics5d agoview on r/geopolitics ↗
• W

  RE: https:// flipboard.social/@newsguyusa/1 17294253051630005 ah the rich smell of bullshit Denmark will have collectively rolled their eyes by now

  weezmgk@mastodon.socialMastodon5d agoview on Mastodon ↗
• T

  Denmark caved to president Trump. Denmark did not give Greenland to America but America has complete control over military bases in Greenland. Greenland has no say whatsoever as to what American can build or can't build. And no adversary of America can have any investment in Greenland unless America approves it. So basically, and I said this…

  ThickGur5353r/politics5d agoview on r/politics ↗