Grossman reframes 'rogue AI' as human decision-making failure
2 Sep 19 8:10 AM · 8d ago · 2 posts · 1 source · development 2 of 3
Commentator Nicholas Grossman posted a reaction endorsing Cottom's argument, stressing that AI systems did not autonomously 'go rogue' but were deliberately connected by people in ways that produced unpredictable outcomes.
“AI didn’t “go rogue.” People connected a computer system they know can mess with another computer system in unpredictable ways to less advanced computer system and it messed with that computer system in unpredicted ways.”
Nicholas GrossmanTressie McMillan Cottom New York Times opinion columnistNicholas Grossman Commentator/social media poster
The whole story articlesposts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 1 voice · verbatim
-
AI didn’t “go rogue.” People connected a computer system they know can mess with another computer system in unpredictable ways to less advanced computer system and it messed with that computer system in unpredicted ways. As @tressiemcphd.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy argues, don’t lose sight that *people* did that. Opinion | Panic Won’t Fix the ...
All 3 developments of NYT Opinion: AI Panic Over 'Rogue' Incidents Misses the… →
NewswiresMastodonHacker News