Commenters debate the Minster's response and information handling
2 Sep 20 6:19 AM · 4d ago · 1 post · 4 comments · 1 source · development 2 of 2
Online discussion emerged questioning the Minster's process and the evidence for the Hamas designations. One commenter noted the Minster had been given names in two batches and had attempted to respect sensitivity by removing flagged panels beforehand, while expressing skepticism about whether all claims had been substantiated.
“Even if all the names are legitimately of terrorists, and I think there's basically no evidence anyone has shared for that, it's clear the Minster tried to respect the sensitivity.”
Tallis-manLeeds Minster Cathedral and cultural institution
The whole story articlespostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 4 voices · verbatim
-
It's hard to assess this. The Minster was given an initial list of names and deliberately didn't show those panels. Then they were given a second batch of names, after the tapestry has gone on display. Even if all the names are legitimately of terrorists, and I think there's basically no evidence anyone has shared for that, it's clear the Minster…
-
TIL The UN High Commission on Human Rights is not part of the UN https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/sessions-regular/session62/a-hrc-62-crp-2.pdf and that 49,000 is somehow large than 77,000
-
No way. The Church and State should always be separate. All religions cherry pick and ignore parts that doesn't make sense in the modern day.
-
I'm not sure the current crowd believe in anything much besides student union politics.
All 2 developments of Leeds Minster removes tapestry over names of Hamas members →
Google NewsReddit