Online backlash accuses owners of censoring speech at public venues
1 Sep 19 8:22 PM · 4d ago · 1 post · 6 comments · 1 source · development 1 of 2
Commenters argued that stadiums receiving state funding should not be able to restrict who performs, framing the ban as a First Amendment or public-funding issue.
“Government funded venues censoring speech to protect a genocidal regime sounds like a First Amendment violation.”
@amardguru.bsky.socialMacklemore Musician banned from the stadiumsDavid Tapper Panthers owner
Arthur Blank Falcons owner
Jeffrey Lurie Eagles owner
Robert Kraft Patriots owner
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 7 voices · verbatim
-
B
Panthers owner Tapper, Falcons owner Blank, and Eagles owner Lurie banned Macklemore from the stadiums. All of these stadiums receive state funding. What gives these owners the right to say who can and cannot play at the stadium. Kraft owns the Patriots stadium. l.
-
Government funded venues censoring speech to protect a genocidal regime sounds like a First Amendment violation.
-
This is Robert Kraft, pictured here with a child rapist and a mass murderer. When Kraft needed a lawyer for the solicitation charge in Fla. Epstein recommended one. When Epstein gave that lawyer a heads up, the lawyer's comment was maybe the Kraft charge will ease some of the pressure on you. 1/2
-
Might be time to revisit the tax status of those stadia? Asking for local and states who may need a little extra for their public services that support those places …
-
What give Macklemore the right to tell people to Hate the Jews as much as he does or he will destroy you. How bout a STOP THE HATE Global Music Tour, sir
-
All of these men are jewish, and clearly do not want even the suggestion of Palestinian humanity.
-
I thought the beef was with Ed Sheeran, not random other people.
All 2 developments of NFL owners Tapper, Blank and Lurie bar Macklemore from… →
Bluesky