Team leads and engineers voice strain from LLM output volume
2 Sep 21 9:28 AM · 6d ago · 2 comments · 1 source · development 2 of 4
In Reddit comments, engineers describe the pressure to lower review standards as LLM-generated code volumes surge. A team lead reports struggling with demands to accept lower-quality changes and more hand-waving about maintainability concerns, while acknowledging that requests for granular changes result in 'more slop.' Others draw parallels to earlier technology waves where automation increased output without increasing quality.
“I've found it increasingly difficult to handle the firehose of LLM-generated changes, so I am on the receiving end of this pressure to lower review standards.”
ConnaitLesRisquesPostHog Developer tools companypopzxc Software engineer and criticPaul D'Ambra PostHog engineer
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 2 voices · verbatim
-
Good article, thanks for sharing your thoughts! I’m a team lead and we’ve always had a strict review process on "my" projects. Lately, I’ve found it increasingly difficult to handle the firehose of LLM-generated changes, so I am on the receiving end of this pressure to lower review standards. I’m really struggling with how to deal with that. I’ve…
-
Wait you think PR reviews are a problem that’s solved by writing code by hand? You’ve never dealt with devs who put out atrocious 1k line PR “they spent a whole sprint working on” that doesn’t fit into the architecture but the moment you say something they run to their manager to complain and in the end their team closes this PR, opens identical…
All 4 developments of Debate flares over AI code review automation: bottleneck or… →
RedditHacker News