sinbad endorses stable software as superior in current era
2 Sep 22 4:30 AM · 1d ago · 1 post · 1 source · development 2 of 4
A game developer responds to the post, calling the older idea that stable software is "dead" idiotic, and arguing that software with minimal changes over years is high-quality in the current landscape.
“the idea of a project being "dead" because it was stable and not getting weekly updates was idiotic. In the slop era, software that hasn't had significant changes barring a few small careful fixes for 3 years is S-tier”
sinbadtante Software developersinbad Game developermpe Developerexchgr Developer
The whole story posts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 1 voice · verbatim
-
S
RE: https:// tldr.nettime.org/@tante/117313 713101758213 I’ve been saying for years that the idea of a project being “dead” because it was stable and not getting weekly updates was idiotic. In the slop era, software that hasn’t had significant changes barring a few small careful fixes for 3 years is S-tier in my book
All 4 developments of Open source community embraces "maintenance mode" as sign… →
Mastodon