Politics
Trump’s FWS memo lets ESA-protected species be killed if death isn’t the intent
Ars Technica ties Trump's ESA rewrite to Scalia's 1995 dissent
1 Sep 22 10:29 AM · 1d ago · 1 article · 1 source · development 1 of 2
Ars Technica reported that the Times found the dissent in a 1995 Supreme Court ESA case, written by Antonin Scalia, is serving as the "blueprint" for the new FWS enforcement approach, with the administration arguing the majority opinion was invalidated by the later end of Chevron deference.
“This is an incredibly sneaky and disingenuous way of going about things.”
Ben Levitan, Earthjustice senior attorney
Donald Trump US President
Brian Nesvik Director, US Fish and Wildlife ServiceBen Levitan Senior attorney, EarthjusticeAntonin Scalia Former Supreme Court Justice (deceased)
The whole story articlesposts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
4 PMyesterday8 AM4 PMtodaynow · 10:11 AM ET
Reported in the same hours no headline names this development itself — these 1 claim were published in its stretch
-
first by Ars Technica, 1d ago
All 2 developments of Trump’s FWS memo lets ESA-protected species be killed if… →
Google NewsHacker NewsBluesky