Online debate splits over credibility of denial and accuser
2 Yesterday · 18h ago · 5 comments · 1 source · development 2 of 3
Reddit commenters divided between skepticism of the accuser's motives, defense of her right to withdraw consent regardless of lifestyle, and agnosticism about who is telling the truth.
“i’m not judging Zion on his own. i’m judging the way people immediately believe it’s lies and gold-digging.”
dothfade_Zion Williamson New Orleans Pelicans forwardJane Doe Unnamed accuserWilliamson's attorney Defense counsel for Zion Williamson
The whole story articlespostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 5 voices · verbatim
-
I don't disagree with anything you've said here. I do not blanket believe professional athletes nor do I automatically believe women. They're both humans and humans lie constantly. They both might be lying here. The idea that you think I think all professional athletes are angels is laughable. I am 50% that it's he's guilty, 50% that it's her…
-
i’ve seen this argument a hundred times. i don’t care how many of you have seen how professionals and IG girls move. they’re still capable of withdrawing consent, of not wanting to be choked, of saying no to anal or gangbangs midway through the act. i’m not judging Zion on his own. i’m judging the way people immediately believe it’s lies and…
-
Lmao, "thank god the California laws for the things I'm accused of don't apply to where they allegedly happened - but I didn't to them either of course!"
-
That’s because Reddit isn’t a court of law. A random person doesn’t have to think someone is innocent until proven guilty.
-
nah irl Saul Goodman is Brian Steel and he's busy beating murder charges and rico cases for famous rappers.
All 3 developments of Zion Williamson calls accuser relationship 'friends with… →
RedditNewswiresMastodon