Reuters and other outlets amplify FT's Broadcom review report
2 Yesterday 1:12 AM · 23h ago · 5 articles · 1 source · development 2 of 2
Reuters, Investing.com and other outlets republished the FT findings, noting Reuters could not independently verify the report and that Broadcom and SASAC did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
“domestic chips for domestic use”
Financial Times reporting, describing Beijing's self-sufficiency campaign · rss ↗SASAC Chinese state asset regulatorBroadcom US semiconductor and networking equipment makerHuawei Chinese tech conglomerateH3C Technologies Chinese networking equipment supplierRuijie Networks Chinese networking equipment supplier
The whole story articlesposts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Reported in the same hours no headline names this development itself — these 1 claim were published in its stretch
-
first by Investing.com News, 1d ago · also Techstrong IT, Finimize, Reuters, Financial Times
4 more headlines
- China Targets Broadcom in Push to Replace Foreign AI Hardware in State Data Centers: Report Techstrong IT · 22h ago
- China Takes A Close Look At Broadcom Gear In State Data Centers Finimize · 22h ago
- China surveys Broadcom switch use in state data centers, FT reports Reuters · 22h ago
- Sources: China's SASAC, which oversees state-owned companies, is surveying the number of Broadcom switches in state-backed data centers amid a domestic AI drive Financial Times · 22h ago
What people said 17 voices · verbatim
-
China blocks entire companies/entire industries and then cultivates home grown copies, its a running joke from Beijing to Silicon Valley LOL. So does the US. Ask Huawei for one. At least China doesn't arrest company officers on Trumped up charges. The US does. Just ask the Canadian judge who oversaw the US attempt to render a Huawei C official…
-
FT: So much focus in China on hardware independence. Now its weighing curbs on Broadcom switches that may account for up to 90% of state-backed data-centre deployments. China's State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission has spent recent weeks surveying Broadcom use across state-c...
-
America has required foreign powers to partner with US companies in order to enter the market? That's news to me America has been stealing IP since there's been an America. https://apnews.com/general-news-b40414d22f2248428ce11ff36b88dc53 If you think that was 200 years ago and it's different now, think again. Industrial espionage is still US…
-
🚨EXCLUSIVE: China is scrutinizing Broadcom's grip on its AI data-center networks. A government survey found Broadcom switches make up as much as 90% of networking equipment at some state-owned companies. China's state-assets regulator, SASAC, is now examining whether Broadcom used its market pos...
-
Hi, you're on r/Stocks , please make sure your post is related to stocks or the stockmarket or it will most likely get removed as being off-topic/political; feel free to edit it now and be more specific. To everyone commenting: Please focus on how this affects the stock market or specific stocks or it will be removed as being off-topic/political…
-
Which has been the standard operating procedure in the US for centuries. America has required foreign powers to partner with US companies in order to enter the market? That's news to me I don't even know what that means. So China is bad for doing what we are forcing them to do? If someone does bad because you make them, doesn't that mean you are…
-
Which has been standard operating procedure in China for decades Which has been the standard operating procedure in the US for centuries. China is bad for doing what they're doing so we force them to do the same I don't even know what that means. So China is bad for doing what we are forcing them to do? If someone does bad because you make them…
-
People buy Huawei because they are cheap, the Chinese Government doesn't have the same budget issue. European nations and the European Union are increasingly banning or restricting Huawei equipment from sensitive geographical zones and critical telecom networks over national security risks. Do you really think Huawei is at the same level as…
-
Any *major* geopolitical power in existence today could absolutely produce things locally if they really wanted to. The cost for certain things might be significantly higher due to low reasons or hard to get to resources, but none of the major powers today are in a scenario where they physically don't have specific resources within their borders
-
Specifically Broadcom’s takeover bid for Qualcomm was scuttled by national security concerns. Back when it was still registered in Singapore, it was suspected to be a front for Chinese interests. But changing its domicile to USA didn’t help either. So it’s fun to see Broadcom now getting footballed by the other side.
-
critical resources and components are being produced within their borders This is completely infeasible -- the world isn't like age of empires where resources are spread out equally around the map. Some countries have resources within their borders that quite frankly others will never have access to naturally
-
honestly, any major geopolitical power should ensure that critical resources and components are being produced within their borders Biggest mistake the west did since the end of the cold war was outsourcing large portions of our important industries to foreign countries
-
China has already spent enough years copying everyone else's technology so that they can start making those copies locally. If your investment relies heavily on the "China" market, I would not put faith in those investments being around for
-
Chinese would have done this anyway, their game has always been to close off their own markets after stealing ip and subsidizing companies - all while they cry on a global stage and want access to everyone elses markets.
-
It still doesn't matter now because they're banned from US, Canada and now most of Europe. Great news is now that they want to nationalize they have plenty of unsold devices to do so.
-
Yeah but you're (or the government via tariffs is) still gonna have to solve the problem of cheap, foreign labor pricing domestic products out of the market
-
wouldn't you want a healthy mix as well to encourage local production to keep up with international competition?
All 2 developments of China's SASAC surveys Broadcom switch use in state data… →
NewswiresMastodonRedditX