First Amendment attorney argues White House action violates due process and free speech
2 Yesterday 6:41 PM · 6h ago · 1 post · 1 source · development 2 of 2
Theodore Boutrous, a prominent First Amendment attorney representing the media organizations, argues that the letters sent to the three organizations on Tuesday (after the ban had already been announced) are insufficient notice. He characterizes the White House's process as unconstitutional and the ban itself as viewpoint-based retaliation.
“not even close to conforming to due process and the first amendment”
Theodore Boutrous
Donald Trump U.S. PresidentTimothy J. Kelly U.S. District JudgeTheodore Boutrous First Amendment attorney for media organizationsMichael Kenneth Velchik Justice Department attorney
The whole story articlesposts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 1 voice · verbatim
-
U
Due process was not followed, said judge, when CNN, MS Now and Politico were banned from White House
All 2 developments of Judge Questions Due Process in Trump's Ban on CNN… →
NewswiresBluesky