Online observers debate whether Rubio meant Iran or U.S. regime change
2 Sep 23 1:29 PM · 1d ago · 15 comments · 1 source · development 2 of 3
Commenters on Bluesky immediately questioned the ambiguity of Rubio's statement, with several interpreting 'regime change' as potentially referring to the United States government rather than Iran. The confusion became the dominant thread of discussion.
“Is talking about regime change in the US or Iran?”
nreynolds.bsky.social
Marco Rubio U.S. Secretary of StateRon Filipkowski Bluesky commentator
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 9 voices · best of 15 · verbatim
-
Is talking about regime change in the US or Iran?
-
Say what? A regime change or a change in regime? The first is Iran and the 2nd is US?
-
Is he talking about regime change in Iran... OR HERE??? Fuck this guy.
-
Makes me wonder which regime he had in mind.
-
He's right--------- as soon as Trump goes
-
We won the war! It's not a war! There is no regime change, but change the regime! Troops dead? Civilian casualties climbing? SMALL POTATOES! Still not a war. But it's a war and we won. But we're still being bombed. NOT A WAR.
-
Doesn’t he know that middle eastern countries will battle till their eyes bleed when they are picked on. The regime change should be trump goes.
-
When you're lying, and nobody knows which is the "lie of the day," it's hard to keep that messaging straight.
-
I was told it’s specifically not a war by the guy wearing a t-shirt with “This is War” on it.
All 3 developments of Rubio claims Iran war won, sparks confusion over 'regime… →
Bluesky