Judge Kelly rejects national security argument
1 Yesterday 3:51 PM · 11h ago · 1 post · 167 comments · 1 source · development 1 of 1
Judge Kelly concluded there is no valid 'national security' argument in the case, rejecting the Trump administration's rationale for its legal position.
“BREAKING: Judge Kelly just concluded there's no "national security" argument in this case”
muellershewrote.com · bluesky ↗Judge Kelly Federal judgeTrump administration Defendant/moving party
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 24 voices · best of 172 · verbatim
-
M
BREAKING: Judge Kelly just concluded there's no "national security" argument in this case (CNN/MSNOW/Politico)
-
💙🐈⬛🐈🐈⬛💙 People really need to think about the hundreds of millions of taxpayers dollars that have been spent in litigation by the Trump administration!!
-
The only national security threat in this case is Donald Trump…
-
D
Good. There’s no national security only Trump’s insecurity.
-
. The squatter in the White House was, is and always will be: ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️
-
The current US national security vulnerabilities are self-evident
-
Trump uses the national security excuse for everything now. We can thank SCOTUS.
-
Counter point: his entire cabinet, JD Vance, Putin, etc.
-
YES! Allison Gill, you have no idea how much I needed some good news on a day that started out fine anwent to shit. Thank you. Thank you for all you've been doing. You rock, lady!
-
A
The only national security concern is Donald.
-
This press ban is also very conveniently happening during the China visit. He wants to appear tough on the free press and he also doesn't want to be humiliated by their questions in the Oval Office in front of XI Jingping like he always is when other leaders visit.
-
J
Just a whole lot of Presidential insecurity. 🙄
-
He’s betrayed his country time again for the benefit of Israel, Russia and individuals who are willing to pay him.
-
Prepare for the worst 💪 Hope for the best.🤷♀️ Try to be the security someone else needs. 🫶
-
Also thanks in advance for covering this.
-
He's a trump appointed judge but at least he didn't cave to this OBVIOUS BS bait. Nice to see integrity remains in the courts.
-
The bad news is that CNN will go back to being thirsty for his attention.
-
What on earth will he do with Xi since he won’t be able to use the press in his standard humiliation ritual?
-
Interesting news from the MAGA lawyer, Harvard grad who joined the regime last fall, who made absorb point of argument. He is a fan of Hitler and write an assignment at Harvard in the voice and viewpoint of Hitler.
-
The primary threat to national security in the White House is Donald Trump himself.
-
There's no national security argument, because it was all about trump's own childish insecurity, nothing more. 🤷🏼♀️ ❄️❄️
-
I do think about it. Everyday. It’s going to take generations to investigate or undo MAGA 2017-2021, MAGA 2025-2029, and the damage in between. Send your favorite MAGA Politician, frien, work peer or relative this reminder .
-
D
No kidding. Of course there isn’t. Trump is just making stuff up. cbwrong.
-
Of course not, there was no argument to be made otherwise. So now we wait for a trump judge to overthrow it? Those judges need to be disbarred, or worse.
All 1 developments of Judge Kelly rejects Trump's national security argument in… →
Bluesky