Hacker News commenters question whether project demonstrates real intelligence
2Yesterday 4:16 PM · 21h ago · 1 comment · 1 source · development 2 of 6
Discussion surfaced disagreement about what the project reveals. Some praised the speed and cost efficiency, while others noted the model makes poor decisions, gets stuck in loops, and relies heavily on scaffolding (pathfinding, milestones). Observers questioned whether this represents meaningful progress in AI reasoning.
“the most interesting thing about this jev stuff is that people are seemingly like completely disinterested in how smart it actually is”
ralusek
pancomplexDeveloper, project authorJevSmall language model
The whole story articlespostscommentsthe bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
This is kinda chill to have in the background. I wish there were livestreams showing live reasoning of top models which are currently trying to solve cancer or whatever. Imagine the pogs in chat when it does.
Looking at the diagram in the gh repo, it looks like this is entirely jev. Are there any examples of people having a big model like Fable handle high level goals?