Part of Trump's Deportation Expansion · 3 stories · since Sep 14 · newest 1h ago
Supreme Court lets Trump administration use SAVE database to screen voter rollsMarc Elias publishes explainer on the ruling's stakes
7 Yesterday 10:30 PM · 16h ago · 1 article · 8 posts · 15 comments · 4 sources · development 7 of 7
Election lawyer Marc Elias released a video breaking down what the SAVE ruling means for voters, emphasizing the database was never designed for election eligibility checks.
Donald Trump President
Ketanji Brown Jackson Associate Justice, Supreme Court
Ken Martin DNC ChairLeague of Women Voters (coalition) Lead plaintiff, voting/privacy advocates
Marc Elias Election lawyer, Democracy Docket
The whole story articlesvideospostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Reported in the same hours no headline names this development itself — these 1 claim were published in its stretch
-
first by CBS News, 3h ago
What people said 19 voices · best of 22 · verbatim
-
D
The Supreme Court just let Trump use a flawed database to purge voters. It was never built for elections. Marc Elias explains. Stay in the know:
-
Since the Roberts Court has decided the president is immune to all criminal liability for any actions that are core functions of his office... The president can just order the arrest of anybody without any legal justification, sure it's false imprisonment, sure it's kidnapping, sure it's conspiracy. But the president can't be held criminally…
-
Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on voter citizenship checks – JURIST The US Supreme Court on Friday allowed the federal government resume checking voters’ citizenship against Social Security records,… # UnitedStates # US # USA # theWhiteHouse # TrumpAdministration
-
M
The SCOTUS decision increases the likelihood that eligible voters will be wrongly labeled as noncitizens due to faulty data and removed from the rolls.
-
"Could" is being very generous. Basically what should be expected is that dozens of millions of votes should be invalidated in one way or another, Republicans win in a landslide, and then they use their own corruption as "evidence" as to how much Democrats have cheated at elections the entire time up until now, thanks to all these efforts by the…
-
N
The high court will allow the Trump administration to use an immigration database to check state voter rolls.
-
Enough with that, there always Democrats who fill the role of defectors and then they throw their hands up like "we didn't have the votes". Meanwhile we have Sinema, Fetterman and that guy from West Virginia going rogue. There's always space for a rogue democrat meanwhile Angie Nixon get ZERO support from the national party. They're controlled…
-
That's bizarre first and foremost because voting isn't supposed to be a federal matter, but one managed by states!
-
Wording issue that I think it's important. They will lose their ability to vote but not their right to vote. Laws do not determine rights. It would be right for the people who are going to be affected to be able to vote, therefore they still have the right. The fact that they might be allowed to exercise their right is, well, wrong .
-
The court may someday rue this type of decision. When the top court in the land is this corrupt, it leaves good citizens fewer and fewer options.
-
Love how the title leaves out the word "illegal" before "voter" it's like they want you to believe that they're removing large amounts of random people with no reason. Gotta love fear mongering and blatant misinfo.
-
So even the unconstitutional justices are terrified about midterms…. Epstein controls from the dead while Twump controls from the desperate
-
why does it feel like every new ruling somehow makes voting more complicated instead of easier shouldnt this be the one thing we agree on protecting for everyone
-
P
The latest in election rigging by the Republicans> @reuters.com The US Supreme Court revived an expanded immigration database that President Trump's administration said aims to combat voting by noncitizens but critics contend could disenfranchise eligible voters. The justices granted the DOJ's>
-
Yes the party who doesn't control a single part of the government is to blame here, what a dumb post. You are part of the problem.
-
The conservative members of the court will continue to feed the beast. It is just incomprehensible to not see that the partisan court is determined to continue to make our lives miserable for some time.
-
I won’t tolerate the infringement of my right to vote. Under no circumstances will I accept that idea.
-
Idkidk about that. All they have to do is consider each case "individual" and do it whatever number of times they want. Not sure mass is defined in the law.
-
https://www.gregpalast.com/the-gestapo-meme-that-became-a-trump-executive-order/
All 7 developments of Supreme Court lets Trump administration use SAVE database… →
NewswiresMastodonRedditHacker NewsBlueskyXYouTubeGoogle News