Plaintiffs and civil rights groups call ruling 'profoundly disappointing'
1 Sep 25 2:11 PM · 6d ago · 1 article · 1 post · 2 sources · development 1 of 1
The plaintiffs and counsel team in the case said the Supreme Court's decision puts 'millions of Americans at risk of being unlawfully targeted by the administration's unreliable voter purge database' and vowed to continue fighting the expanded SAVE program in the district court.
“millions of Americans at risk of being unlawfully targeted by the administration's unreliable voter purge database”
Plaintiffs and counsel team
Donald Trump President
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Supreme Court justiceJudge Sparkle L. Sooknanan U.S. District Court judge
David Becker Election law expert, Center for Election Innovation and Research
The whole story articlesposts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What was reported 1 claim about this development
-
1 outlet Supreme Court lets Trump administration use revamped federal voter eligibility database for now
first by Philadelphia Inquirer, 6d ago
What people said 1 voice · verbatim
-
B
The Supreme Court's ruling on the SAVE database shouldn't affect the 2026 election. Under federal law, you can't systematically remove voters from the rolls within 90 days of an election.
All 1 developments of Supreme Court lets Trump use SAVE voter database before… →
BlueskyNewswires