Anthropic says it will consider further legal options
2 Sep 25 · 6d ago · 1 article · 3 posts · 3 sources · development 2 of 2
An Anthropic spokesperson said the company disagrees with the ruling and noted a separate court had already found the government's parallel designation unlawful.
“We respectfully disagree with the court's decision. Another federal court has already held the government's parallel designation unlawful. We remain confident in our position and are considering all options, including further review.”
Anthropic spokespersonAnthropic AI company challenging the blacklisting
Donald Trump US President
Pete Hegseth US Defense SecretaryJudge Gregory Katsas DC Circuit appeals judge
Judge Neomi Rao DC Circuit appeals judge
The whole story articlesposts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Reported in the same hours no headline names this development itself — these 1 claim were published in its stretch
-
first by Ars Technica, 6d ago
What people said 3 voices · best of 5 · verbatim
-
S
Pentagon judges ruled that "overly constrained AI models" risk failing military operations, allowing the department to… #Semiconductors #AIInfrastructure #GPU #DefenseTech
-
Pointing out the categorical difference is correct. But a military fails as soon as it is surpassed by enemy capabilities in conflict, meaning the threshold of failure increases with technological advancement. Having two powers, one adopting AI-assisted systems, and the other not, makes the latter quickly lose, even though it hasn't lost any…
-
S
Court rules Pentagon can blacklist Anthropic for refusing to enable Claude features - Ars Technica
All 2 developments of DC Circuit lets Trump keep Anthropic blacklisted from… →
NewswiresMastodonRedditGoogle NewsHacker NewsBluesky