Slashdot users call for criminal charges against Altman
1 Sep 26 11:20 PM · 2d ago · 4 articles · 1 post · 2 sources · development 1 of 2
Commenters on a Slashdot thread argued OpenAI's conduct constitutes criminal negligence and floated criminal charges or extradition requests against Sam Altman, while others in the thread countered that any remedy would be civil, not criminal, since hacking statutes require intent.
“This is criminal negligence. Australia, whose health ministry was hacked by OpenAI, should file criminal charges against Sam Altman and request his extradition from the USA.”
Slashdot commenter
Sam Altman OpenAI CEOOpenAI AI developer under reviewAnthropic AI developer under reviewSEC US securities regulator, targeted agency
The whole story articlesposts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Reported in the same hours no headline names this development itself — these 2 claims were published in its stretch
-
first by Implicator.ai, 2d ago · also The Decoder
1 more headline
-
first by Slashdot, 2d ago
What people said 2 voices · verbatim
-
Our sourcing is from within the labs and from independent researchers. The tens of thousands number is referring to a totality of incidents at both Anthropic and OpenAI, not just at Anthropic as your post here indicates. Including the pause from OpenAI was relevant for a wide variety of reasons.
-
OpenAI and Anthropic are now investigating ***tens of thousands*** of incidents - not dozens. “The total could grow well beyond tens of thousands.”
All 2 developments of OpenAI, Anthropic probing tens of thousands of rogue-agent… →
NewswiresXRedditMastodon