Education leaders and scholars criticize earnings-based loan eligibility
1 Sep 27 · 1d ago · 2 posts · 2 comments · 2 sources · development 1 of 2
Ted Mitchell of the American Council on Education and Stanford professor Jonathan Gienapp voice concerns that earnings potential does not reflect educational mission or social value. Gregory Baylor of Alliance Defending Freedom argues the government shouldn't punish socially valuable callings based on salary.
“The government shouldn't punish people who pursue socially valuable callings just because in its judgment they don't earn enough money.”
Gregory Baylor
President Trump Administration headTed Mitchell American Council on EducationGregory Baylor Senior counsel, Alliance Defending FreedomJonathan Gienapp Stanford professorEducation Department Federal agency implementing rule
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 2 voices · verbatim
-
It's about money. Let's say Ohio, if the college is nationalized. Ohio need to beg federal government for funding their majors that may seems unnecessary, I imaging stem majors. Fed can always say, you just need an agricultural school, let other students go to California. But now, Ohio can fund their own schools with their own planning.
-
Such a lack of imagination. He seems to think any act of curiosity and wonder is anti American. Another example of his base stupidity.
All 2 developments of Trump bans student loans for low-earning degrees →
MastodonRedditXBlueskyNewswires