Redditors dismiss the story as a recycled, relocated template
3 Sep 27 8:41 PM · 1d ago · 11 comments · 1 source · development 3 of 3
Commenters note the same article format has circulated before with different countries named, questioning whether bulk orders for bulk-sale bookstores are actually 'suspicious.'
“This is just the same article that gets posted here everyday when the location of the sellers being changed.”
SuppaflyAnthropic AI company operating Claude chatbotPatrick Hempelmann Owner, BMV Books (Toronto)Peter Sellers Owner, Sellers & Newel (Toronto)Innodata New Jersey-based AI data companyZoom Books Pitt Meadows, B.C. book reseller and recycler
The whole story articlespostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 13 voices · verbatim
-
"I looked at a bunch of books on my shelf and they all have "all rights reserved"-Just because a book says something is forbidden, doesn't mean the law says that. The law explicitly allows fair use. From the US copyright office, "Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of…
-
Agreed, but you're saying that the scenario 10 years in the future isn't happening right now. The few megaconglomerates active in the AI space are run by anti-humanist people controlling the information output. If they destroy the information from which they derived their power then how can you say that the scenario they're painting isn't…
-
This is just the same article that gets posted here everyday when the location of the sellers being changed. I've seen this three or four times now, last time it was "Japanese booksellers flag suspicious..." There is nothing suspicious with booksellers that sell bulk books receiving orders for bulk books.
-
You've been on this thread for an hour getting downvoted for parroting AI shill talking points so you figure it's best to strawman a new argument to pivot to huh? Be less work to concede and reconsider your points
-
Lololol. It's a shock to see someone that knows what they are talking about. Most of the comments here are based on misinformation and a lack of understanding (no lack of hate) of training AI works.
-
Xerox, Einstein. Pretty hard to take your opinions as being informed or well educated when you're getting simple things like that wrong.
-
We talked about this in class Billy, copying your classmates before changing the paragraphs around isn't 'making something new'.
-
where is that information preserved exactly? can you send me a link to these preservation copies? i'd love to see them.
-
They're not doing whatever. They're using them to train the AI. Which is not making a copy of it just reading it.
-
So you knowingly made a useless comparison? “Guys look some people paid for rights to things” yeah, no shit.
-
Are the AI supporters people? Reddit has a problem with their fundamentals when bots upvote pro AI posts
-
"Ever heard of a copyright strike?"-Ever heard of copyright trolls? Copyright troll - Wikipedia
-
So literally all you’re saying is “well some books are public domain” Yeah no shit
All 3 developments of Anthropic's mass book-scanning for Claude sparks bulk-order… →
RedditGoogle News