AI-detection link cited as evidence of machine-generated text
9 Nov 2 7:41 AM · 9d ago · 3 comments · 1 source · development 9 of 9
cadey posts a Pangram history link asserting the content is AI output, escalating the authorship dispute from suspicion to a claimed detection result.
“It is AI output, 100%”
cadeyandros Creator of Tyrtulianemin Commentercadey Commenterwheybags Commenterploum Commenter, maintainer of Offpunk
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 6 voices · verbatim
-
This also very much reads like an LLM wrote it...
-
https://www.pangram.com/history/23e189e9-88f0-4a7b-8d5e-5e29ae6b3873?ucc=n9Q5PQBvn71&utm_source=pangram_share&utm_medium=copy_link It is AI output, 100%
-
Are you using an LLM to write these replies?
-
Ugh, this is one of the unfortunate things about all this that I've run into a few times now too. The best explanation I can come up with is that LLMs have been trained on the same corpus that I've been reading and internalizing for the last 30 years I've been on the internet. The (negative; positive: examples) form has elicited accusations of my…
-
I’m happy to read that my replies are generated by an LLM, rather than my article itself. That’s progress! No, my replies have not been generated using LLMs; rather, they have been crafted with care and patience.
-
I regret to inform you that I write my own comments.
All 9 developments of Tyrtulia, a passwordless terminal forum, draws scrutiny for… →
Hacker NewsLobsters