Wired details why Odyssey and MRO have outlasted expectations
1 Oct 27 6:45 AM · 12d ago · 2 articles · 2 posts · 1 comment · 4 sources · development 1 of 1
Wired publishes a feature explaining the engineering, redundancy, and luck that have kept Odyssey and MRO running far beyond their design lives, including Odyssey's unmeasured, dwindling propellant reserve and MRO's navigation fix, while noting scientists' uncertainty about whether NASA will field successors.
“Both Odyssey and MRO are some of the most productive spacecraft that have ever existed”
Briony HorganBriony Horgan Planetary scientist, Purdue UniversityRob Lillis Planetary and space physicist, UC BerkeleyPaul Fieseler Chief engineer for MRO, NASA Jet Propulsion LaboratoryNASA Agency operating both spacecraft
The whole story articlespostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Reported in the same hours no headline names this development itself — these 1 claim were published in its stretch
-
first by WIRED, 12d ago
What people said 1 voice · verbatim
-
What about the Viking spacecraft, as I understand they were powered by nuclear RTG’s?
All 1 developments of NASA’s Mars Odyssey and MRO Orbiters Keep Running Decades… →
NewswiresGoogle NewsRedditMastodon