Commenters criticize investment priorities relative to IPCC needs
3Oct 30 6:52 AM · 9d ago · 3 posts · 2 sources · development 3 of 3
Multiple social media users echo the argument that a fraction of climate startup funding could sustain the IPCC for decades, framing the funding crisis as a symptom of misplaced priorities.
nature.com
“You could fund the IPCC for the next half-century with a miniscule fraction of the amount of money that's been poured into absurd, hypey AI/climate start-ups *just this year*”
Oct 27Oct 28Oct 29Oct 30Oct 31Nov 1Nov 2Nov 3Nov 4Nov 5Nov 6now · 10:51 AM ET
What people said 2 voices · best of 3 · verbatim
K
You could fund the IPCC for the next half-century with a miniscule fraction of the amount of money that's been poured into absurd, hypey AI/climate start-ups *just this year* We've got some absurd, messed up priorities at the moment
Duro editoriale di Nature: molti Paesi stanno tagliando i finanziamenti all'IPCC, mettendo a rischio l'esistenza stessa del gruppo di esperti sui cambiamenti climatici delle Nazioni Unite https://www. nature.com/articles/d41586-026 -03403-6