Critics warn IPCC projections enable "predatory delay" on emissions cuts
1 Oct 27 11:34 PM · 11d ago · 2 posts · 2 sources · development 1 of 1
The analysis argues that treating speculative future carbon removal as a reliable climate solution creates dangerous incentives to postpone definitive emissions reductions. The piece characterizes the IPCC's approach as "bedtime stories about the future, complete with fictional numbers" that distract from proven climate actions.
“Magical thinking about massive levels of carbon removal can fuel a kind of 'predatory delay,' where the promise of future technologies (which typically never arrive) is favored over definitive action today.”
Project DrawdownIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Climate assessment bodyProject Drawdown Climate analysis organization
The whole story posts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 4 voices · verbatim
-
G
The IPCC assumes that we will see *massive* increases in carbon removal. This is reckless, unwarranted, and irresponsible.
-
G
"Projections for future carbon removal are unrealistically optimistic. Some climate scenarios project removing 10–30 billion metric tons of CO₂ annually by 2100 – a roughly 5,000- to 15,000-fold increase from today – with no scientific justification." https:// drawdown.org/insights/heres-wh…
-
G
Scenarios used by the IPCC assume that we will see *massive* increases in carbon removal. But the problem is there is no *real evidence* to justify these rosy scenarios. And many, many reasons to be skeptical. I think this is reckless, unwarranted, and irresponsible.
-
S
Here’s why assuming massive growth in # carbonremoval is reckless and unwarranted https:// drawdown.org/insights/heres-wh y-assuming-massive-growth-in-carbon-removal-is-reckless-and-unwarranted
All 1 developments of IPCC carbon removal projections face scathing criticism as… →
BlueskyMastodon