Commenter contextualizes complexity across implementations
6 Nov 1 10:38 AM · 10d ago · 1 post · 1 comment · 2 sources · development 6 of 6
A viewer points out that GNU utilities are especially complex and notes simpler alternatives exist in Busybox and Plan 9 implementations.
“GNU utils are very maximalist though. Busybox touch is much simpler, especially if you cut out the optional ifdeffed susv3 features”
zokier, Hacker News commenter · hn ↗Video creator (unnamed) Programmer/content creator
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 4 voices · verbatim
-
GNU utils are very maximalist though. Busybox touch is much simpler, especially if you cut out the optional ifdeffed susv3 features: https://github.com/mirror/busybox/blob/master/coreutils/touc...plan9 touch is also pretty clean:
-
if it only needs to work on his PC then its not tok bad. these utils are often full of crap because they need to work on everyones pc with wacky locales and filesystems and all sortsof crap this guy wont run into.its always the case if ud implmenet everything just for your case you can skip most edge cases and software can be much more…
-
This reminds of the CoderPad-style interview. Kinda triggering, but might be a good way to practice the muscle! Anyone else agree?
-
- waiting for no AI, no game engine, pure c++ modern warfare 4 game from scratch
All 6 developments of Developer builds Linux file utilities in C by hand without… →
Hacker NewsMastodonLobsters