FlokiNET highlights structural opacity in automated takedown model
2 Oct 30 · 12d ago · 1 article · 4 posts · 3 sources · development 2 of 2
FlokiNET argues that when a third-party company files claims on behalf of a government agency, accountability breaks down: they cannot identify who inside ICE authorized the takedown or what information was presented to decision-makers.
“We cannot see who inside ICE decided this site should go, whether anyone did, or what they were shown before deciding. We are being asked to validate a claim whose author we cannot identify.”
FlokiNETFlokiNET Icelandic hosting providerU.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Federal agency seeking removalZeroFox Security contractor for DHSDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) Contracting agency
The whole story articlesposts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Reported in the same hours no headline names this development itself — these 1 claim were published in its stretch
-
first by HN Frontpage, 12d ago
What people said 1 voice · verbatim
-
A
More detail on the DHS leak takedown story from the Icelandic hosting company. It seems DHS subcontracted their online enforcement to a security company using AI to slurp the web. https:// blog.flokinet.is/2026/10/29/ic e-wants-its-mask-back-and-hired-a-company-to-ask/
All 2 developments of ICE hired ZeroFox to demand takedown of Icepick, a site… →
MastodonHacker NewsNewswires