Ouellette calls the documentary shallow and says Holmes fooled Fielder
1 Oct 30 7:30 AM · 13d ago · 2 articles · 4 posts · 4 sources · development 1 of 1
In Ars Technica's review, Jennifer Ouellette argues the film manufactures ambiguity but yields little real insight, contending Holmes still deflects blame exactly as she did throughout her trial; the piece is widely reshared across Ars Technica's social channels.
“Elizabeth Holmes is back on her bulls—t, and some people are falling for the act all over again.”
Jennifer Ouellette
Elizabeth Holmes Disgraced Theranos founderNathan Fielder Co-director of "You Can See Everything"
Lance Oppenheim Co-director of "You Can See Everything"Jennifer Ouellette Ars Technica reviewer
The whole story articlesposts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Reported in the same hours no headline names this development itself — these 1 claim were published in its stretch
-
first by Ars Technica, 13d ago
What people said 5 voices · best of 6 · verbatim
-
M
I enjoy Nathan Fielder, but I still don't have an interest in watching this because it feels dirty and misleading. This ARS article helped put words to some of these feelings. There are spoilers, and knowing the twist doesn't make me more interested in watching it.
-
D
“Even in a world awash in #deepfakes and #misinformation, there are still some #truths that can be known, no matter how doggedly #Fielder and #Oppenheim try to muddy the waters” (this piece kind of explains why I feel no real desire to see this #film)
-
D
I don’t know if anyone else has seen You Can See Everything, but I checked it out this weekend, and i appreciated this review:
-
S
Awesome review of Elizabeth Holmes, “… back on her bullshit.”
-
P
Musk, Theil, Zuckerberg, Ellison etc, are just-as-bad as she is. But because they’re men, they escape prison.
All 1 developments of Ars Technica review says Nathan Fielder's Holmes… →
MastodonBlueskyNewswiresGoogle News