Community voices echo concern about VC-backed project standards
3 Oct 31 5:14 PM · 11d ago · 3 comments · 1 source · development 3 of 5
Commenters on Lobsters aligned with Bushell's framing, arguing that once a project takes VC funding and shifts to "grow at all costs" ambitions, accountability for basic standards like accessibility increases proportionally.
“once you take millions of dollars to turn a community project into a VC backed "grow at all costs" one, the amount of grace afforded is not the same.”
ejriDavid Bushell Web developer and accessibility criticTangled GitHub alternative code forge
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 3 voices · verbatim
-
Agreed, once you take millions of dollars to turn a community project into a VC backed "grow at all costs" one, the amount of grace afforded is not the same.
-
A base font size of 12px in this decade truly is beyond the pale. It doesn’t so much *call into question* their competence as much as *utterly disprove* it. (I think I probably last saw such a preposterous base size on a new site about ten years ago, and HN is the only commercial site I can think of off the top of my head still around.) Sure, you…
-
And by “accessibility” in this case you just mean “usable by people over 40”. I saw a similar situation arise in a well-funded mobile app targeting an older audience — literally the older you are, the more you likely need to do in the app. The designers made the whole thing use tiny dark grey text on light grey. (With tons of whitespace, of…
All 5 developments of Accessibility critic says Tangled's redesign fails basic… →
LobstersHacker News