Commenters argue open-source SaaS model mirrors support services like Red Hat
7 Nov 2 3:40 AM · 9d ago · 4 comments · 1 source · development 7 of 8
A commenter suggests that open-sourcing SaaS isn't novel; service providers already monetize by offering support and service around FOSS (comparing to Red Hat's Linux model), avoiding rent-seeking only if the software itself can't be held hostage.
OccupySaaS Movement organizerLaid-off engineers (collective) Movement participants
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 4 voices · verbatim
-
Thats easy: service providers can train on the spftware to offer the service. Its literally what theyre for. Redhat didnt make linux but charges a reasonable price to support it. Like lets open source slack or something, and enterprises could self host it, or get it served by one of the service providers that pop up. And if there are bugs that are…
-
> The software built by the 99% belongs to the 99%.Aren't the 99% received salary for their work and produced this after being fully paid what they agreed voluntary for their work?If my house was build by 10 people, can they just get the house back after I've paid them?
-
Apache 2 seems like an odd licensing choice for the ideology, surely GLM or some other copyleft license is more fitting for the whole "stop companies exploiting our labour" idea.
-
goal seems to be to create 1-1 API and feature compatibility, which is very different from various open source IdPs
All 8 developments of OccupySaaS: Laid-Off Engineers Launch Open-Source SaaS… →
Hacker News