conv.

← The whole story
Culture
Analysis of US baby names shifting between genders sparks discussion on naming trends

Commenter argues article overstates the transitions by conflating rare names with trendy shifts

A detailed comment challenges the framing, noting that most cases represent names moving from rare-and-mixed usage to suddenly trendy for girls, not from genuinely popular boys' names. Ashley is cited as an example: rare for both genders before 1960, it then ramped up dramatically for girls (927 in 1970, peaking at 54,856 in 1987) while also increasing for boys but to a much lower peak (746 in 1980).

“This article misleads by presenting these transitions as from "popular boys name" to "popular girls name", when in fact most of the cases here are from "rare name, sometimes used for boys and sometimes girls" to "suddenly trendy for girls".”

gregates

NameDaisy author Data analyst / blog writer

The whole story articlespostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump

Peak 12 pieces in 3h at Nov 2, 10 AM; 47 pieces over 10 days (2 articles · 2 posts · 43 comments) Nov 2, 10 AM — 12 pieces · 2 articles · 1 post · 9 comments — Hacker News 10, Newswires 2Nov 2, 1 PM — 12 pieces · 12 comments — Hacker News 12Nov 2, 4 PM — 8 pieces · 1 post · 7 comments — Hacker News 7, Mastodon 1Nov 2, 7 PM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Hacker News 2Nov 2, 10 PM — 3 pieces · 3 comments — Hacker News 3Nov 3, 1 AM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Hacker News 2Nov 3, 4 AM — 4 pieces · 4 comments — Hacker News 4Nov 3, 7 AM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Hacker News 1Nov 3, 10 AM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Hacker News 1Nov 3, 1 PM — quietNov 3, 4 PM — quietNov 3, 7 PM — quietNov 3, 10 PM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Hacker News 1Nov 4, 1 AM — quietNov 4, 4 AM — quietNov 4, 7 AM — quietNov 4, 10 AM — quietNov 4, 1 PM — quietNov 4, 4 PM — quietNov 4, 7 PM — quietNov 4, 10 PM — quietNov 5, 1 AM — quietNov 5, 4 AM — quietNov 5, 7 AM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Hacker News 1Nov 5, 10 AM — quietNov 5, 1 PM — quietNov 5, 4 PM — quietNov 5, 7 PM — quietNov 5, 10 PM — quietNov 6, 1 AM — quietNov 6, 4 AM — quietNov 6, 7 AM — quietNov 6, 10 AM — quietNov 6, 1 PM — quietNov 6, 4 PM — quietNov 6, 7 PM — quietNov 6, 10 PM — quietNov 7, 1 AM — quietNov 7, 4 AM — quietNov 7, 7 AM — quietNov 7, 10 AM — quietNov 7, 1 PM — quietNov 7, 4 PM — quietNov 7, 7 PM — quietNov 7, 10 PM — quietNov 8, 1 AM — quietNov 8, 4 AM — quietNov 8, 7 AM — quietNov 8, 10 AM — quietNov 8, 1 PM — quietNov 8, 4 PM — quietNov 8, 7 PM — quietNov 8, 10 PM — quietNov 9, 1 AM — quietNov 9, 4 AM — quietNov 9, 7 AM — quietNov 9, 10 AM — quietNov 9, 1 PM — quietNov 9, 4 PM — quietNov 9, 7 PM — quietNov 9, 10 PM — quietYesterday, 1 AM — quietYesterday, 4 AM — quietYesterday, 7 AM — quietYesterday, 10 AM — quietYesterday, 1 PM — quietYesterday, 4 PM — quietYesterday, 7 PM — quietYesterday, 10 PM — quietToday, 1 AM — quietToday, 4 AM — quietToday, 7 AM — quietToday, 10 AM — quietToday, 1 PM — quietToday, 4 PM — quietToday, 7 PM — quietToday, 10 PM — quiet 1–6
Nov 3Nov 4Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9yesterdaynow · 11:35 PM ET

What people said 22 voices · verbatim

All 6 developments of Analysis of US baby names shifting between genders sparks… →

Hacker NewsNewswiresMastodon