AI
Sean Goedecke debunks "superhuman" LLM weight-editing claims
Goedecke argues the results are not genuinely superhuman
1 Nov 2 3:00 PM · 5d ago · 1 article · 1 source · development 1 of 2
Sean Goedecke publishes a technical analysis rejecting the paper's framing. He argues that identifying games from activation heatmaps is straightforward visual pattern-matching, and that Astra's weight-editing approach—using steering and ablation—matches the standard methodology any competent ML researcher would deploy.
“A smart human ML researcher could perform all of these tasks.”
Sean GoedeckeSean Goedecke ML researcher and analystGPT-6 Astra Frontier LLM model
The whole story articlesposts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Nov 3Nov 4Nov 5Nov 6yesterdaynow · 9:15 AM ET
What was reported 1 claim about this development
-
first by AIM, 5d ago
1 more headline
- LLMs are not superhuman at reading and writing neural network weights seangoedecke.com · 5d ago
All 2 developments of Sean Goedecke debunks "superhuman" LLM weight-editing claims →
NewswiresHacker NewsMastodonBluesky