Legal experts attribute rejections to weak arguments, not election-timing reluctance
2 Nov 3 1:06 PM · 5d ago · 1 article · 1 source · development 2 of 2
Constitutional law experts said the recent setbacks for the administration and Republicans at the Supreme Court reflect the poor quality of their legal arguments. Loyola Law School professor Justin Levitt called the DOJ's California case "hot garbage," while Ohio State's Edward Foley noted the court did not even request California's response, indicating the filing was exceptionally weak.
“I think, frankly, the broader string of losses by Republicans, by the DOJ, is because their cases haven't been very good.”
Justin Levitt
Donald Trump PresidentJustin Levitt Loyola Law School professor, election law expertEdward Foley Ohio State University election law expertU.S. Supreme Court Judicial body with 6-3 conservative majority
The whole story articles the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What was reported 1 claim about this development
-
first by Jerusalem Post, 5d ago · also Japan Times, Reuters
1 more headline
- Trump’s Supreme Court winning streak in election cases screeches to a halt Japan Times · 4d ago
What people said 1 voice · verbatim
-
T
The winning ways for U.S. President Donald Trump and his fellow Republicans came to a sudden halt in election-related decisions at the Supreme Court in recent weeks. https://www. japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/11/ 04/world/politics/trump-supreme-court-election/?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=mastodon # worldnews # politics # donaldtrump # us #…
All 2 developments of Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to block California mail… →
NewswiresMastodonGoogle News