Public Knowledge calls federal demand unconstitutional
1 Nov 3 5:39 PM · 4d ago · 2 articles · 6 posts · 4 sources · development 1 of 2
Consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge supports California's position, characterizing the Trump administration's demand as lacking legal basis in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
“This administration's prepostitious demand that industry be given a blanket waiver from affordability requirements, net neutrality and privacy protections… has no basis in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), which established BEAD.”
Raza PanjwaniCalifornia Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) State regulatorJohn Reynolds CPUC PresidentNational Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Federal agency administering BEAD programTrump administration Executive branchPublic Knowledge Consumer advocacy group
The whole story articlesposts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Reported in the same hours no headline names this development itself — these 1 claim were published in its stretch
-
first by Ars Technica, 4d ago
What people said 1 voice · best of 2 · verbatim
-
R
"You MUST allow tech oligarchs to fuck customers!" Laws for GREED. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) decided last year that states must agree not to enforce any rate regulation or net neutrality rule on ISPs that receive money.
All 2 developments of California accepts $1.4B broadband funds while defying… →
MastodonNewswiresRedditBluesky