Stephen A lists his punishment for Kawhi and the Clippers if the cap circumvention allegations are proven true: “Void Kawhi’s contract, ban…
Conversation activity · last 24 hours peak 12/hr
Clustered from 31 items across 1 source. Not yet parsed — the coverage below is the raw record.
Social posts 2
Voices from the web unedited
-
Honestly on second thought, have it all go to local LA charities, suspend Kawhi for 1-2 years, and have him actively oversee the projects and work with the community. That’s the worst punishment for him, and it would do some legitimate good. Ballmer’s punishment (in addition to not being allowed into NBA arenas or events or even to do public…
-
But he WAS the driving force. That’s hardly debatable considering he brought the same proposition to other teams. We don’t need to wonder who came up with the idea of a no show endorsement deal, it was reported years prior to this that Kawhi had been requesting it from teams. That makes him the driving force behind this. I’m not even sure what…
-
What really stinks here is the Clippers benefitted from Kawhi’s services for 5 years, likely in no small part due to their circumventing the cap. Both the Raptors and the Lakers flagged aberrant behaviour and the league did nothing. Only now that the Leonard era under Ballmer has ended is the league getting serious about an investigation. I get…
-
It's only leverage, if the organization makes it possible The Clippers (like the Raptors & Lakers) should have said no, these 'Uncle Dennis' asks are not legal in the NBA, will not be entertained, and should never be brought up again Bad organizations get compromised all the time by allowing agents, and other people attached to players, way more…
-
NBA constitution says in Article 35, that Silver can suspend a player for a definite or indefinite a amount of time for “conduct that doesn’t conform to standards of morality or fair play, or that’s prejudicial or detrimental to the league.” He doesn’t need the circumvention article for that. If it’s 13 or more games the NBPA can take it to…
-
If he were to have $140b in the bank at 2% interest per year, he'd make $7.67m per day. NBA could fine him $7.5m per day, everyday, and he'd still be making money. Making $170k per day Over $1m per week Over $5m per month We get a parking ticket and our finances are fucked for a couple months.
-
How is this fucking with other rich peoples money though? Simply being paid through other agreed upon means is not fucking with anyone's money. It's just a deal they all agreed to. None of this is being done cause some rich person complained they were losing money.
-
The longest a ban can be is a year and the maximum fine is only 7mil. They can’t do anything more than that because it would be against the cba and wouldn’t hold up in an appeal and arbitration. The penalties are out dated but that’s what they are.
-
But you said Kawhi is the driving force . Ballmer and his employers and collaborators are inthe driver's seat here. That was the motivation for my comment. And you're hardly different from Stephen A. in applying more blame than Ballmer.
-
Stephen A Smith aint dumb. He knows talking shit on Balmer can cause him massive career ending issues. Kawhi on the other hand cant do shit to him so the lower hanging fruit it is