Commenters question methodology and claim attribution
2 Sep 11 11:04 AM · 12d ago · 6 comments · 1 source · development 2 of 4
Within minutes, commenters began raising concerns about peer review, the stage of development, and whether Ferrer alone deserves credit. One commenter noted a similar injectable gel was developed at UC San Diego in 2012, suggesting the claim overstates novelty.
“I am glad other countries have not abandoned science.”
davidicw.bsky.social, Bluesky commenter · bluesky ↗Pilar Ferrer Argentine biologist
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 6 voices · verbatim
-
D
That is great. I am glad other countries have not abandoned science. cbwrong.
-
there were other scientists in that team, but they chose the gorgeous one for the interview ,to steal my heart and it worked 😍
-
Umnn… so I want to believe this, but where is the link to the peer-reviewed journal
-
She's a cow heart scientist. This is click bait. It's nowhere near human heart science.
-
Sowas passiert übrigens, wenn man begabte, talentierte Menschen fördert, anstatt eine klassistische, rassistische, misogyne Gesellschaft zu kultivieren, in welcher Menschen kraft Herkunft & Geschlecht von Entwicklungschancen ausgenommen werden. Vom Erfolg profitiert dann die gesamte Gesellschaft!
-
Just don’t let Bobby Kennedy get a hold of her because Hill find some reason to think that her product causes autism
All 4 developments of Argentine biologist Ferrer develops injectable gel for… →
Bluesky