Critic argues AI scaling bet is mathematically doomed
1 Sep 14 4:53 PM · 13d ago · 1 post · 1 source · development 1 of 3
FantasticalEconomics posts that Silicon Valley and Wall Street backers have wagered the global economy on scaling LLMs into AGI, but argues this is a losing bet because large language models are mathematically guaranteed to produce plausible-sounding errors, and increased water and energy consumption yields only marginal improvements.
“A handful of bros in Silicon Valley and Wall Street have wagered much of the global economy on being able to hyperscale stochastic parrots into AGI super beings.”
FantasticalEconomicsFantasticalEconomics AI economics criticbrucelawson@vivaldi.net Technology observerisotopp@infosec.exchange Technologist
The whole story posts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 1 voice · verbatim
-
F
A handful of bros in Silicon Valley and Wall Street have wagered much of the global economy on being able to hyperscale stochastic parrots into AGI super beings. Many in the know have long known that is a losing bet as LLMs are mathematically guaranteed to produce plausible sounding errors (too often called "hallucinations"). Sucking up increasing…
All 3 developments of Tech investors bet on AI despite fundamental economic doubts →
Mastodon