Commenter raises trust question in AI regulation framework
5Sep 20 7:10 PM · 5d ago · 1 post · 1 source · development 5 of 5
A Mastodon user (joseph11lim) questioned proposals to regulate AI as nuclear weapons, noting the poor track records of major tech companies on tax evasion, consumer harm, and antitrust violations.
heise.de
“Would you entrust these AI to entities with indicted records of tax evasion, peddling products that harmed children, or engaged in anticompetitive practices…”
Sep 16Sep 17Sep 18Sep 19Sep 20Sep 21Sep 22Sep 23Sep 24now · 11:48 AM ET
What people said 4 voices · verbatim
G
“Super-intelligent AI won’t kill us. Dumb billionaires are doing that all by themselves” by Jonathan Cook on Substack @ uk_politics @ ai @ thegreenparty @ environment @ bigtechalert “The super-rich have already screwed up the planet in their pursuit of power and profit. AI simply gives them a new tool to hasten their story – and ours – to its…
“it's not AI killing us all I'm as worried about, so much as it is my fellow humans using AI to kill and harm one another.” https:// venturebeat.com/technology/why -im-not-worried-about-ai-killing-us-all-and-you-shouldnt-be-either
On the question of whether the Hugging Face hack is a sign that AI is "going rogue" and might wipe us all out, we recommend two pieces of analysis, from Ed Zitron and @ pluralistic https://www. wheresyoured.at/ai-is-already- in-dangerous-hands/ https:// pluralistic.net/2026/09/12/god -in-the-box/ To quote Doctorow: "Every part of the Hugging Face…
RE: https:// wandering.shop/@cstross/117304 269712239346 Some of the wisest suggested to # regulate # GenAI as if they were # nuclear weapons. My question to that is: "Would you entrust these # AI to entities with indicted records of # taxevasion , peddling products that harmed # children , or engaged in # anticompetitive practices - and some were…