Critics endorse essay for exposing ulterior motives in AI doomsaying
4 Sep 20 12:46 PM · 5d ago · 1 post · 1 source · development 4 of 5
A Mastodon user (inthehands@hachyderm.io) praised the essay as valuable for audiences newly realizing AI safety warnings carry financial motives, though noting it stops short of fully exploring how panic-mongering serves ultra-wealthy interests.
“The linked article is pretty good, and worth the click. (Spoiler: it's the humans who are the real monsters.)”
inthehands@hachyderm.ioJürgen Geuter Tech researcher and commentator
Dario Amodei Anthropic CEO
Sam Altman OpenAI CEO
Elon Musk Tech entrepreneur and AI commentatorJacob Coxon Former Anthropic researcher
The whole story posts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 2 voices · verbatim
-
RE: https:// wandering.shop/@cstross/117304 269712239346 The linked article is pretty good, and worth the click. (Spoiler: it’s the humans who are the real monsters.) I suspect it’s especially good for its audience: people who are just now realizing the AI doomsaying carries ulterior motives, and aren’t quite as deeply embedded in all this as us…
-
G
“The Rogue Swarm and the Federal Backstop: How Safety Warnings Could Become a Backstop for Big Tech“ by Fabio Vighi in Savage Minds on Substack @ uk_politics @ bigtechalert @ adelaide_block_bigtech @ bigtech “Let’s be serious and ask the only question that truly matters here: what does this sudden AI-panic wave actually produce? One thing it…
All 5 developments of Critic challenges AI safety narrative as industry hype →
Mastodon