Commenter flags author as presenting personal theories rather than consensus
3Sep 16 11:24 PM · 7d ago · 2 comments · 1 source · development 3 of 4
A commenter noted the website presents one scientist's personal theories rather than field consensus, comparing the framing to popular theorists like Harari and cautioning readers about the boundary between well-grounded theory and speculative work.
cosmicave.org
“Note this website appears to be based around the personal theories of a scientist rather than a presentation of the consensus of the field.”
Sep 17Sep 18Sep 19Sep 20Sep 21Sep 22yesterdaynow · 2:58 AM ET
What people said 2 voices · verbatim
M
Note this website appears to be based around the personal theories of a scientist rather than a presentation of the consensus of the field.Perhaps similar to somebody more famous like Harari in that respect.The author appears to be legitimate in his scientific background but the repeated implications of the revolutionary nature of his work are…
>between well-grounded theory...But how is the "dials" that the author describes, which "science" use to make the theory fit the facts of observation, more grounded?
